A theist may sometimes use a god-of-the-gaps argument when faced with a gap in our knowledge for a natural explanation for something. But if that gap begins to be filled with evidence from science, history, or logic and it increasingly points to God, a non-theist will often make a fantasy-of-the-gaps move to avoid it.
A wife and mother mentoring her five children. She had no idea how her legacy would ripple around the world and into the future.
The concept of ‘true’ and ‘false’ is absurd when applied to natural outcomes. If ‘true’ and ‘false’ are to have any meaning, then our thoughts and decisions cannot merely be physical outcomes.
Are there any real moral laws? For those who in enjoy logic and rational thinking, here is a logical approach.
Scientist, philosopher, clergyman, wilderness adventurer, husband, nature photographer, …
Short videos and formal debates